Twitter Tipping Point

I am sensing a Twitter Tipping Point. Not only was it the hot topic among friends at a bar this weekend, KQED interviewed Twitter co-founder Biz Stone this week about the role of this social networking tool.

At the bar last Saturday my friend asks his twitter savvy friend why he should use this mini-blogging tool. The response came in the form of a question: "Do you remember when I told you to use Facebook eight months ago?" he asked. "Now you use it often and don't need me to tell you why to use facebook," he said. "Well, that's whats going to happen once you start using Twitter."

That's exactly what Stone said as people wrapped their heads around why they should start using this technology. In an interview on KQED's Forum, Stone spoke with host Scott Schafer and bay area callers about why Twitter is important, how to best use it, and the implications of its use.

The main thing that seems to differentiate Twitter from other social networking sites is its closeness to real-time interaction. Even news events over the past few months have been given immediate access to the public via twitter. Just look at the Mumbai attacks or the landing of the plane on the Hudson River in January.

If Twitter is going to become a source of up to the minute news, Schafer asked about how much credibility users should be giving this "news." Stone believes that there does not need to be a mediator, the truth will prevail. The truth will emerge because once something false is presented, Stone says another twitter user will come along and correct it. He also emphasized the need for twitter users to authenticate information for themselves by choosing their sources wisely and/or cross checking information with other sources.

More practical ways that Twitter is being used:

- Twitter is a vehicle for keeping a blog's readers updated on new posts.
- It can be used in dangerous situations. Just look at the journalist student who alerted his network of twitter friends when he was arrested in Egypt.
- Twitter is a great way for companies and organizations to keep their customers or members updated on promotions or events.

There are probably a million other ways that Twitter can be used and I imagine its role will continue to evolve as it becomes more mainstream. In my sphere of friends and acquantences only a few tech-savvy ones religiously use Twitter. However, I am sensing a tipping point. While Twitter currently seems like a piece of technology that I can live without, my interest has been sparked and I am really interested to try it. My main worry is that Twitter will make me document every second of my life rather than live it. But, I am open to the possibility that it could find a niche in my world and become an important way for me to connect to information as well as share it. I'll keep you updated on when Twitter inhabits my life. What are your thoughts on the Twitter tipping point?

Business Reporters Blow It

As we currently face our financial debacle, many blame the press for not doing a better job of alerting citizens to the approaching collapse. Former Wall Street Journal reporter, Dean Starkman, traced the history of Business Journalism and found that there was a significant shift among business reporting that lead to the audience being referred to as investors rather than citizens. It was approaches such as these that Starkman mentions were the reason behind business reporters missing the biggest story of possibly their career.

Caption: Unused newspaper racks clutter a storage yard in San Francisco, California on Friday, March 13, 2009. (AP Photo / Noah Berger)

The image sadly speaks for itself.

Some related articles:

San Francisco Chronicle May Cease Operations

Seattle Post-Intelligencer Dies, Reborn Online

How Do We Know What We Know?

Iraq viewed through an armored vehicle. (Photo: Benjamin Lowy / The New York Times)

How do we know what we know is a deep philosophical question, yes, but on the more practical level it can be applied to how we make sense of our present world. For instance on the issue of Iraq, this question is a deeply fascinating one to ask Americans. How do Americans know what they know about Iraq, a country that is far away yet deeply connected to our own. The avenues for receiving information on what is happening in Iraq include:

- Reading the news from reporters who are stationed there or from news agencies who have Iraqi contacts in the region.
- Hearing the President or Generals report on the situation.
- Hearing scholars and analysts sum up the situation as they see it.
- Possibly directly hearing about it from service members when they return.

A recent piece from the Washington Post, "What We Don't Know About Iraq," brings up a source of information that often doesn't reach Americans ears:

The view from Iraqis themselves.

Americans have an interest in understanding the way Iraqi's view the war, especially since they are partners in securing their country so that foreign forces can leave them be (or that's what the US military says will happen).

In his piece, Phillip Bennet writes about the names Iraqis have used over the past six years to describe the situation, as told to him by the Washington Post's Baghdad correspondent, Anthony Shadid: "ghazu or 'invasion'; sometimes 'the events'; occasionally 'sectarian war'; and most often, and most hauntingly, suqut -- simply 'the collapse.'"

The above is an interesting to me because we don't often see news articles framed or informed by the average Iraqi perspective.

Bennet cites the 2008 book "The Forever War," by Dexter Filkins, as a strong account of how and why information from Iraqis is not entering the American consciousness. Filkins writes, "there were always two conversations in Iraq, the one Iraqis were having with the Americans and the one they were having with themselves."

Sometimes what we know is not easy to find out and is hidden by cultural or power relation barriers. What would happen if Americans had access to the thoughts and feelings of Iraqis regarding the US war in Iraq?